In 1994, NBC debuted a brand new sitcom with the unassuming identify Friends. Over the subsequent ten years, this present would come to dominate the airwaves, inspiring hairstyles and influencing the tv panorama perpetually. But today, some folks want the present had been courageous sufficient to increase that affect on the behalf of the LGBTQ neighborhood. It seems Friends got here very shut to creating one main character homosexual, however on the final minute, they missed their probability for that degree of inclusion.
The easy genius of ‘Friends’
RELATED: ‘Friends’: Matthew Perry Demanded Writers Scrap Chandler’s Strip Club Story Arc
Friends was based mostly on a premise that sounds nearly too easy. Six associates of their twenties dwell in the identical Manhattan house complicated (largely) and share their ups and downs, romances and heartbreaks, triumphs and humiliations.
The characters on Friends shortly felt just like the viewers’ precise associates, and other people developed sturdy views about who must be courting whom. While the present lined many different points, together with profession issues, earnings inequality between associates, and the correct technique to deal with a jellyfish sting, the romances had been the most well-liked a part of the present. The characters had been perpetually falling in love with somebody new, and Ross and Rachel had been all the time breaking apart and getting again collectively.
But today some viewers really feel that Friends missed a superb alternative to convey a bit of extra equality to the airwaves. The producers nearly made the choice to have one character’s romantic life be actually groundbreaking tv.
Chandler was nearly homosexual
According to the New York Times, in its day Friends was thought of very progressive, as a result of there was a same-sex couple on the present. But whereas this was an enormous departure from how the LGBTQ neighborhood was depicted on tv on the time, by today’s commonplace it doesn’t appear as if they had been respectfully represented on the present in any respect.
One of the reoccurring jokes of the present was that folks saved assuming that Chandler (performed by Matthew Perry) was homosexual. According to Ranker, the present’s producers thought of truly making Chandler homosexual, which might have been an enormous transfer on their half. Instead, they caught with the repetitive jokes about it, and the way uncomfortable it made Chandler really feel.
Some folks really feel that the homophobia of this working gag wasn’t the one approach the present missed the mark. They clearly didn’t observe via with the plan, which means that in addition they fumbled a chance for inclusion after they modified their thoughts about writing Chandler as a homosexual character.
The present’s producers missed an awesome probability
The causes that Chandler didn’t find yourself being written as homosexual are unclear. According to the Daily News, it’s identified that Perry as soon as vetoed a script that made him uncomfortable. In the storyline, he was alleged to sneak right into a homosexual bar as a result of he loved the tuna soften they served. Given his detrimental response to this script, some folks suspect that Perry refused to play a homosexual character, and that’s why Chandler ended up straight.
In the top, the connection between Chandler and Monica was one of many excessive factors of the present. Perhaps the rationale the producers deserted their plans for a homosexual Chandler was merely due to the chemistry between the 2. That concept is actually extra palatable than the notion that Perry was unwilling to play a homosexual character.
Regardless of why it turned out that approach, Chandler and Monica turned out to be an awesome couple. Everyone was glad for them after they discovered their fortunately ever after ending. And loyal followers loved their romance a lot that it’s straightforward to neglect how groundbreaking Chandler may have been.