‘Friends’: Writers Didn’t Originally Plan to Break up Ross and Rachel

by Jeremy Spirogis
David Schwimmer as Ross Geller, Jennifer Aniston as Rachel Green

Geller and Rachel Green
ended up collectively ultimately, however the Friends characters didn’t have a clean journey to realizing
their love. The duo initially obtained collectively in season 2 of the sequence after a
few bumps within the highway and spent a 12 months in a dedicated relationship earlier than writers
broke them up in a scene that also tugs at followers’ heartstrings, greater than 20
years after the episode first aired. What would have occurred if Ross and
Rachel didn’t break up? How completely different would the present have been? Well, it nearly

Ross and Rachel’s breakup angered followers however gave the sequence a
lot of endurance

Ross and Rachel’s sexual pressure was offered to followers in
the very first episode of the present. Over the primary season, it turned clear that
Ross was desperately in love with Rachel, and she or he was completely clueless about
it. The
will-they-won’t-they trope
really pushed the present ahead in the course of the
first season. There is an issue with that preliminary pressure, although, placing the
characters collectively rapidly can smash the circulation of a sequence.  

[embedded content material]

‘Gilmore Girls’ Steal a Storyline from ‘Friends’?

Once Ross and Rachel lastly attached followers had been thrilled,
however even essentially the most ardent Ross and Rachel followers can admit that their relationship
utterly modified the dynamic of the present. Something gave the impression to be lacking whereas
they had been in a relationship. By breaking apart the pair, writers had been in a position to
reinject the sequence with that unique pressure and drive the story ahead. In
the top, breaking apart the couple may need been precisely what the present wanted to
obtain it’s long-term success.  

Fans have debated whether or not or not Ross really cheated for

Ross wasn’t the most well-liked character on Friends. In
truth, because the years wore on, he turned the
most disliked of all the characters
. Writers took the hapless Ross and turned
him right into a little bit of an egomaniac. His character growth helped give the present
a bit extra pep, and the pivotal second for his character gave the impression to be dishonest
on Rachel. But, did he really cheat?

David Schwimmer as Ross Geller, Jennifer Aniston as Rachel Green
David Schwimmer as Ross Geller, Jennifer Aniston as Rachel Green | Robert Isenberg/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal through Getty Images through Getty Images

RELATED: ‘Friends’:
A Fan Theory Attempts to Rationalize Ross Cheating on Rachel

Fans have debated the deserves of his dishonest for many years.
Some consider that the couple was on a break when he slept with Chloe, whereas
others insist {that a} break didn’t imply he was free to sleep with the primary
particular person to cross his path. Some followers have even rationalized his dishonest by
suggesting he was deeply broken by his failed marriage. After all, Carol
Willick was the primary person who Ross ever slept with; then, she
cheated on him with Susan Bunch

Writers didn’t initially plan to interrupt up Ross and Rachel

Ross and Rachel’s iconic break was by no means presupposed to occur.
At least, it’s not what writers had initially deliberate. In an interview with Metro
govt producer Kevin S. Bright, discussed the choice to interrupt up the pair
in season 3. He stated that Marta Kaufman and David Crane determined that the sexual
pressure between Ross and Rachel had seemingly dissipated as their relationship carried
on comparatively seamlessly.

[embedded content material]

Ross and Rachel on a Break? What ‘Friends’ Fans Really Think

Fans might not have initially appreciated the
breakup storyline
, but it surely allowed the writers to have a bit extra enjoyable with
the present. Bright informed the publication that he thought, ultimately, breaking apart
Ross and Rachel was the best transfer. It might have appeared like “torture” to followers,
but it surely additionally gave them one thing to tune into for a number of extra years.

Leave a Comment