Inside the ‘Seinfeld’ Episode That Got a Miller Brewing Executive Fired

by Jeremy Spirogis
Seinfeld

NBC’s Seinfeld created the proper commentary for a ’90s world. The sitcom touched on on a regular basis conditions and turned them into one thing humorous and relatable. Some episodes caught extra flack than others and that’s precisely what co-creators Larry David and Jerry Seinfeld meant. In truth, “The Junior Mint” episode acquired one man fired from his job.

The ‘Junior Mint’ episode re-cap

Seinfeld
Jerry Seinfeld as Jerry Seinfeld, Michael Richards as Cosmo Kramer | Spike Nannarello/NBCU Photo Bank

RELATED: ‘Seinfeld’: What Has Heidi Swedberg Been up To Following the Death of Susan Ross?

While Seinfeld as an entire doesn’t negate something overtly offensive, the “Junior Mint” episode revolved round Jerry’s girlfriend. Namely, it’s that he can’t bear in mind her title. What he does bear in mind is that it rhymes with a feminine physique half.

The star and a part of his crew — George (Jason Alexander) and Kramer (Michael Richards) — take a stab at what her title may be. A few guesses embrace “Mulva” and “Gipple.” When his girlfriend realizes Jerry doesn’t know her title, it involves him as she storms off: Dolores.

One of Seinfeld‘s many presents is refined insinuation. The sitcom lasted so long as it did with thousands and thousands of viewers week after week due to its means to make the most of the ability of suggestion versus stating the apparent.

However, it’s this very episode that landed one Miller Brewing worker in scorching water.

How the ‘Seinfeld’ episode resulted in job termination

RELATED: ‘Seinfeld’: The Iconic ‘Puffy Shirt’ Sold for a Ridiculous Amount of Money

Miller Brewing government, Jerold Mackenzie misplaced his job in 1993. The incident in query got here after Mackenzie allegedly instructed coworker Patricia Best concerning the episode whereas at work, although court docket paperwork mentioned he didn’t truly use the phrase that does, in truth, rhyme with “Delores.”

“You should be able to talk to your co-workers. You should be able to talk to subordinates as you would talk to anybody else,” Mackenzie mentioned through The Los Angeles Times.

“He was on thin ice,” Miller Brewing legal professional Mary Pat Ninneman mentioned, including that Mackenzie confronted earlier reprimands in 1989 for alleged sexual misconduct.

Mackenzie filed a lawsuit towards the corporate the place he banked $95,000 per yr, claiming a number of individuals “interfered with his employment” and that nobody notified him about his termination. Mackenzie additionally added he was “too old” to seek out comparable employment elsewhere. The lawsuit mentioned that the corporate reportedly wished to fireplace Mackenzie for years however used Seinfeld because the scapegoat.

“He’s a goof who comes into work and talks about Seinfeld and finds himself for 1,573 days with no job,” legal professional Gerald Boyle mentioned.

The jury deliberated for six hours earlier than deciding Mackenzie’s destiny.

Here’s how the case concluded

RELATED: ‘Seinfeld’ Star Jason Alexander Says He Could’ve Made a Lot of Money If He Agreed To This Diabolical Thing

The jury didn’t discover any proof of sexual misconduct that was in any method related to Seinfeld‘s “Junior Mint” episode. Mackenzie received $26.6 million in damages.

“They were out to get this guy,” Boyle mentioned. “I am telling you right now what happened to that man is so indecent that it cries to heaven for vengeance.”

Miller Brewing acknowledged they might enchantment on the time. In 2000, a Wisconsin appeals court docket reversed the earlier judgment awarded to Mackenzie. The court docket mentioned Mackenzie “failed to prove that Miller intended to deceive him or that he was financially damaged as a result of any alleged misrepresentation,” based on CBS News.

The ethical of this story is don’t speak about Seinfeld at work — particularly if it’s a very questionable storyline.

Leave a Comment