Chennai: The Madras High Court has held that the unwarranted allegations of use of unsympathetic language in opposition to a feminine worker shouldn’t be an offense underneath the Sexual Harassment Act on the office and the act can’t be allowed to be misused with exaggerated or non-existent allegations. The courtroom granted aid to a senior central authorities official who was accused of sexual harassment by a feminine officer. The courtroom additionally mentioned that the executive head or head has full authority to do the work and has his discretion and privileges.
A bench of Justice M Satyanarayanan and Justice R Hemlata accepted the appliance of V Natarajan, deputy registrar of Trade Marks & GI, Indian Intellectual Property, Chennai, quashing the orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal and District Local Complaints Committee (LCC) in opposition to him. <! –
"It appears that the complainant has made a futile attempt to settle his personal case with the petitioner," the bench mentioned in an order issued on Saturday. Every workplace has to uphold sure etiquette. "The bench mentioned that if a feminine worker is discriminated in opposition to attributable to her incapability or some other official causes, the way in which shouldn’t be the way in which adopted by the complainant.
"Though the Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Prevention) Act, 2013 aims to create an equal and amicable workplace for women at the workplace in which their dignity and self-respect is protected," the bench mentioned. Abuse can’t be allowed to harass the girl. "The girl officer filed a criticism in opposition to the petitioner on December 2, 2013. Troller was a criticism to the General of Trade Marks and GI and patents and design. The girl officer had accused her of misbehavior and conceited conduct within the mentioned criticism and mentioned that it damage her vanity.
The Registrar and Controller General constituted an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) as per the Act. The feminine officer then made one other criticism by which she referred to a number of incidents about Natarajan's "rude behavior". The girl officer talked about the phrase "sexual harassment" at many locations within the mentioned criticism. The girl officer later wrote a letter to the Tamil Nadu State Women's Commission expressing apprehension that the ICC wouldn’t render justice as her criticism was in opposition to the top of the division. After this, on the premise of the investigation of the District Social Welfare Officer, the LCC really useful an in depth departmental inquiry in opposition to Natarajan. Meanwhile, CAT accepted the complainant's petition difficult the formation of the ICC. The petitioner was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal after which he reached the High Court.