The Rolling Stones produced some enormously widespread songs, however they didn’t at all times count on folks to love their songs. Mick Jagger preferred one of many hits from the album Some Girls however he didn’t count on others to embrace it. I addition, members of the band have discussed whether or not the tune was impressed by celebrities like Marianne Faithfull and Buddy Holly.
Mick Jagger preferred a tune he didn’t suppose others would really like a lot
Mick Jagger opened up about songs from Some Girls to Rolling Stone’s Jonathan Cott. When Cott expressed his admiration for “Beast of Burden,” Jagger was shocked.
“I quite like it,” Jagger mentioned, “but I didn’t expect anyone to really go for it, certainly not as much as you. It’s surprising. But I wonder what other people are going to think of the album. I mean, we’ve been knocked a lot recently — I don’t really know what they expect us to do.” It’s attention-grabbing how Jagger was apprehensive folks wouldn’t just like the tune when it took some inspiration from widespread celebrities.
RELATED: Did Mick Jagger Want to Star in ‘The Rocky Horror Picture Show’?
Who is ‘Beast of Burden’ about?
“Beast of Burden” is among the Rolling Stones’ many songs about romantic relationships. Understandably, there’s been hypothesis in regards to the id of the girl within the tune. In an interview with Harper’s Bazaar, Keith Richards discussed this matter.
“Those who say it’s about one woman in particular, they’ve got it all wrong,” he revealed. “We were trying to write for a slightly broader audience than just Anita Pallenberg or Marianne Faithfull. Although that’s not to say they didn’t have some influence in there somewhere. I mean, what’s close by is close by!” So Faithfull had some affect on the tune — however did Buddy Holly?
RELATED: The Classic Rolling Stones Song Mick Jagger Sang Sarcastically
The lyric in ‘Beast of Burden’ Mick Jagger discovered just like a Buddy Holly lyric
In the aforementioned Rolling Stone interview, Cott famous a similarity between “Beast of Burden” and Holly’s signature hit “Peggy Sue.” Specifically, Cott felt a lyric from “Beast of Burden” (“You’re a pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty pretty girl”) was a extra sexual model of Holly’s lyric about “Pretty pretty pretty pretty Peggy Sue.”
“Yeah, it’s true, I never thought of it.,” Jagger mentioned. “It’s funny, that. But to me it’s just a sound — it could be ‘pretty pretty happy happy’…or whatever. I wasn’t thinking of Buddy Holly at all; it’s a completely unconscious thing.” Considering how “Beast of Burden” had some similarities to Holly’s traditional hit, how did the general public react to it?
RELATED: The Classic Rolling Stones Hit Mick Jagger Called ‘Very Dumb and Naive’
How the general public reacted to ‘Beast of Burden’
According to Billboard, “Beast of Burden” reached No. eight on the Billboard Hot 100. This made it a major hit — albeit not one of many Rolling Stones’ largest hits. The band had high 5 hits each earlier than and after the discharge of “Beast of Burden,” so it might have carried out higher commercially. However, “Beast of Burden” appears to get extra airplay today than most different Rolling Stones singles. “Beast of Burden” resonated with the general public — even when Jagger didn’t count on it to.