‘NCIS’ 17, Episode 14: Fans Say A Darker Gibbs May Be Rising Once Again Following ‘On Fire’

by Jeremy Spirogis
Mark Harmon as Agent Gibbs in NCIS

Season 17, episode 14 of NCIS was paying homage to the present’s earlier days. From the thriller on the coronary heart of the episode to the suspense and the emotional subplot carrying the narrative, the episode did all the appropriate issues. It left followers on the fringe of their seats, carrying their hearts on their sleeves. However, primarily based on the way in which the episode concluded, followers have begun making presumptions surrounding the title character — Mark Harmon’s Agent Gibbs. 

Mark Harmon as Agent Gibbs in NCIS
Mark Harmon as Agent Gibbs in ‘NCIS’ | by Sonja Flemming/CBS through Getty Images

*spoiler alert*

What occurred on the finish of the final ‘NCIS’ episode? 

The finish of the final NCIS episode left followers questioning who killed Xavier? Xavier was a person who (arguably) deserved what got here to him, given his try and kill Torres and his sheer audacity, conceitedness, and lack of respect for the legislation. However, brokers will not be alleged to play God, and the tip of the episode hinted that one of many brokers – the daddy determine within the bunch who would do something to guard his workforce, his household — could have turned vigilante. 

[embedded content]

The final episode of NCIS hinted that Gibbs may have been the one to kill Xavier. So, why do such a factor? If this risk seems to be true, Gibbs would have had two major motivations: vengeance and safety. While he was undoubtedly nervous about Torres and angered that somebody tried to take out a member of his workforce, he additionally didn’t need Bishop to take issues into her personal fingers, as such an motion could be irreversible — resulting in years of inside ethical battle. Gibbs informed her to not be like him, and thus could have executed the one factor he didn’t wish to see her do. 

So, what do followers assume — do followers assume Gibbs did it, or was it only a intelligent narrative play? Did the writers discover a method to make it appear doable, solely to ship the reality down the road? 

[embedded content]

Do ‘NCIS’ followers assume Gibbs killed Xavier? Is Dark Gibbs making an entrance?

Fans are divided, as seen within the Reddit dialogue regarding whether or not Gibbs killed Xavier, as many imagine he has the potential, however would have hesitated. One fan acknowledged:

It was Gibbs. He knew Bishop would’ve in all probability executed it had he not. It didn’t hit me till I thought of what he informed her about seeing all of this tragedy however is aware of he has it coming. I’ve had this thought at the back of my thoughts for a very long time that the one method Gibbs will discover peace is in dying however it’s one thing I hope I’m unsuitable about.

Reddit User

While some concurred with the above assertion, others famous that the NCIS writers are infamous for making issues appear a method after which defying expectations. One fan acknowledged:

I’m undecided he did although. I feel they actually set it as much as seem like that. Which is nearly at all times a mislead. I imply severely what number of occasions have individuals supposedly executed one thing or appeared to be useless and haven’t. It’s method too apparent of a play. I can’t and don’t belief it. Plus wasn’t Gibbs within the workplace on the estimate time of dying? I could possibly be unsuitable that final little bit of the episode was a bit of complicated time sensible. 

Reddit User

Other followers chimed in, noting that the timeline appears to level away from Gibbs. However, one other fan famous how a lot he loves “Dark Gibbs” — a aspect of the character that solely reveals up sometimes, and at all times makes for juicy tv. So, have the writers determined to reintroduce Gibbs’ darkish aspect (with a subtext of safety and devotion), or are they simply fooling viewers as soon as once more?

Leave a Comment