‘Spider-Man’: The Real Reason Andrew Garfield Was Replaced By Tom Holland Revealed In Leaked Email

by Jeremy Spirogis
Andrew Garfield Spider-Man

Fans have lengthy speculated about why Tom Holland changed Andrew Garfield as Spider-Man. While some have blamed the actor’s second film as Spidey for why he misplaced the function, an e-mail between Sony execs might reveal the true cause the studio fired him. Here’s a take a look at why Holland changed Garfield plus what he needed to say about his controversial exit.

Andrew Garfield Spider-Man
Former Spider-Man Andrew Garfield | Gregg DeGuire/WireImage

Andrew Garfield says goodbye to Spider-Man

Garfield’s The Amazing Spider-Man was Sony’s first try and reboot the franchise following the top of director Sam Raimi’s trilogy (which starred Tobey Maguire because the eponymous superhero).

The 2012 movie was met with optimistic evaluations and earned over $757
million on the field workplace. Many followers had been additionally happy with Garfield’s model
of Peter Parker and appeared ahead to the sequel, The Amazing Spider-Man 2,
which hit theaters in 2014.

[embedded content material]

Unfortunately, the sequel didn’t go as deliberate. Not solely did it
obtain combined evaluations from the critics, however it solely earned slightly over $700
million in ticket gross sales. Sony initially deliberate to make use of the film as a
jumping-off level for different franchises, together with Venom and the Sinister Six,
however the studio scrapped these initiatives in mild of the movie’s poor efficiency.

Two years later, Sony made a take care of Marvel to deliver Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Marvel subsequently changed Garfield with Tom Holland, who was launched as Spider-Man in Captain America: Civil War.

Is this why Sony fired Garfield as Spider-Man?

There has been loads of hypothesis about why Sony fired Garfield
from the function. The lackluster efficiency of The Amazing Spider-Man 2
definitely bears among the blame, however a leaked e-mail from 2014 gives one other
rationalization regarding his exit.

According to Hindustan
Times
, the e-mail was a part of the Sony hack in 2014 and revealed that
Garfield was fired as a result of he didn’t attend a promotional occasion.

[embedded content material]

RELATED: Tom Holland Is Pushing For Another ‘Spider-Man’ Alum to Join the Marvel Cinematic Universe

The occasion in query featured the pinnacle of Sony, Kaz Hirai, saying the discharge date for The Amazing Spider-Man 3. Garfield reportedly canceled on the final minute as a consequence of an sickness.

“Here we’re about one hour away from our Gala occasion and Andrew
decides he doesn’t
need to attend. He has a relatively scruffy beard and he simply needs to be left
alone,” the e-mail learn.

The Amazing Spider-Man 3, in fact, by no means occurred, and Garfield left the franchise when it headed over to the MCU. Sony has by no means confirmed that Garfield was fired, however the actor has discussed his exit on a number of events.

Garfield dishes on Sony’s e-mail

When Garfield was scheduled to look on the Amazing
Spider-Man 3
occasion, he had simply flown to Rio. The actor claims that he was
not feeling nicely due to jetlag and couldn’t attend the promo.

In mild of the e-mail, it’s clear that Sony bosses had been sad
with Garfield’s resolution to skip the occasion. According to Independent,
Garfield later assured followers that “self-sabotage” was not the rationale
behind his exit.

He additionally added that he didn’t “compromise” throughout his
time as Spider-Man, which can “have been difficult for some people.”

[embedded content material]

In an interview from 2016, Garfield admitted that getting forged to play Peter Parker on the age of 27 was a “dangerous” transfer. He additionally confessed that shedding the half was a very heartbreaking expertise as he is a big fan of the character.

“I signed as much as serve the story and serve this unbelievable
character that I’ve been dressing as since I used to be three, after which it will get
compromised and it breaks your coronary heart. I acquired heartbroken slightly bit,” he
acknowledged.

Did Sony actually fireplace Andrew Garfield?

Despite the entire rumors surrounding Garfield’s exit, he has
remained adamant that the studio didn’t fireplace him. He additionally blames his exit on
the sequel’s poor efficiency in theaters, which he doesn’t suppose was completely
his fault.

In 2014, Garfield stated that he believes producers lower an excessive amount of
materials out of the movie, a transfer that resulted in a messy storyline.

[embedded content material]

RELATED: Spider-Man’s Future within the MCU Reportedly Extended After a Verbal Agreement With Sony

“Once you start removing things and saying, ‘No, that doesn’t work,’ then the thread is broken, and it’s hard to go with the flow of the story,” he defined.

His time as Spider-Man might have ended early, however Garfield’s profession didn’t take a significant hit. The actor went on to play profitable roles in motion pictures like Silence and Hacksaw Ridge.

Leave a Comment