Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band is usually seen because the Beatles’ opus — and John Lennon thought a movie from the 1960s equaled it. The 1960s gave us many mainstream classics together with Psycho, West Side Story, and Planet of the Apes — nevertheless, John was speaking a couple of movie which was way more weird. Interestingly, the film in query was created by one in every of John’s musical contemporaries.
John Lennon stated this artist was ‘too far out’ to be accepted
As its title suggests, Jann S. Wenner’s well-known book-length interview Lennon Remembers consists of John reminiscing about his previous experiences. In addition, he has heaps to say concerning the work of different artists starting from William Shakespeare to Blood, Sweat & Tears to Marcel Duchamp. He additionally discusses an artist who was fairly near him — Yoko Ono. John in contrast Yoko’s work to that of her fellow avant-garde artist, Andy Warhol.
RELATED: The John Lennon Song Pete Seeger Felt Was ‘Nothing’ Until He Sang It
“Her work is far out,” John stated. “Has anyone understood Warhol actually or understood his [films] … Yoko’s Bottoms factor is as vital. [Her] movie is as vital as Sgt. Pepper. The actual hip folks, they learn about it…. But generally, she will be able to’t be accepted, as a result of she’s too far out. It’s onerous to take.”
What Yoko Ono was considering when she made a movie about buttocks
So what was “Yoko’s Bottoms factor?” Well, Lennon Remembers experiences John was referring to Yoko’s 1966 movie Film No. 4 (Bottoms). The black-and-white movie lives as much as its title. It exhibits plenty of bare buttocks and nothing else. Film No. 4 (Bottoms) is 80 minutes lengthy. Why did Yoko make the movie? She defined her creative decisions in an interview with Interview Magazine.
RELATED: John Lennon Thought The Beatles’ Solo Records Were ‘Much Better’ Than the Last Fab 4 Albums
“Basically, I saw an image of it, just that bottom, and I’m seeing the full part filling the screen, and I’m thinking, ‘There’s not a film where one object is filling the screen,’” Yoko defined. “Usually, the object is somewhere in some kind of landscape or against the wall of a room or something. But there is usually something in the frame that is not the object. So I thought it would be very powerful to do something where it was all the object. So it’s all just sort of art ideas.”
How vital is ‘Film No. 4 (Bottoms)’?
Though it’s unusual, Film No. 4 (Bottoms) is definitely progressive. A movie with nothing however objects — on this case, buttocks — is a novelty. Perhaps the movie makes a bit extra sense in context, because the 1960s was a good time for experimental movies.
RELATED: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Morphing Into John Lennon and Yoko Ono, Body Language Expert Claims
However, was John right in saying Film No. 4 (Bottoms) was as vital as Sgt. Pepper? Film No. 4 (Bottoms) didn’t have almost as a lot of an influence on movies as Sgt. Pepper had on music. Film No. 4 (Bottoms) is, like Sgt. Pepper, experimental — though Sgt. Pepper undoubtedly had extra lasting fashionable enchantment.