UP police reply in SC, & # 039; Vikas Dubey's encounter was not faux, bullets fired in self protection & # 039;

by Jeremy Spirogis
778 fine for drunk driving, 1100 for violation of traffic rules – New Year celebration

new Delhi: In the Vikas Dubey encounter case, the UP police has filed a solution within the supreme courtroom. In its response, the police has informed the encounter proper and stated that it can’t be known as a faux encounter in any method. At the identical time, there is no such thing as a doubt in regards to the encounter, for this, the federal government has taken every kind of steps.

In the reply filed by the Director General of UP Police, it has been stated that the rules of the Supreme Court within the encounter case have been utterly adopted. The police opened fireplace in self-defense when a gangster legal escaped from custody by snatching his police weapon.

The Supreme Court can provide an order on this matter on Monday. <! –


After the encounter, in accordance with the rules of the Supreme Court, the UP authorities has arrange a judicial fee which is investigating the encounter.

The UP police has given the checklist of all legal instances filed towards Dubey to the courtroom.

Gautam Gambhir attacked CM Kejriwal, informed the distinction earlier than and after the election

At the time of the encounter, a photograph of the police automobile overturned on the scene, photograph of the physique of Vikas Dubey, photograph of the our bodies of the eight policemen who had been killed by Vikas Dubey have been submitted within the courtroom.

On not handcuffing, the police has clarified that it was immersed with a staff of 15 policemen and three automobiles which needed to be produced in Kanpur courtroom at 10 am on the day of the incident, which was sitting between the policemen on each side of the automobile, so didn’t put handcuffs.

At the identical time, on the change of Dubey's automobile, the police have cleared that Dubey's automobile was being modified incessantly on the best way in view of safety and the automobiles of media individuals coming behind the practice had been stopped to keep away from the issue of visitors jam.

Police have stated that bullets had been fired on Dubey's chest as a result of Dubey had snatched a 9 mm pistol from the police and fired 9 bullets from the entrance of the police, when the bullets fired from the police began in Dubey's chest.

The DGP has stated in response that Vikas Dubey was a gangster. 64 instances had been filed on him. On the evening of two July, 80-90 miscreants attacked the police staff who reached to seize him.

Killed eight policemen. His leg was additionally amputated after killing the Circle Officer.

Encouraging the troopers, Rajnath Singh stated, 'If anybody seems to be along with his eyes, he’ll give a befitting reply'

Police stated that when Vikas Dubey was being introduced, the automobile overturned as a result of heavy rain and cattle approaching the highway 25 km earlier than Kanpur. Vikas began escaping after snatching the pistol. Bullets had been fired on asking for give up. When he turned to shoot, he was hit by three bullets. Despite having a rod in his leg, he was in a position to escape.

The function of the police staff in the whole case is indeterminate. Yet the SIT was shaped to analyze. A fee of inquiry was arrange underneath the chairmanship of the previous choose of the High Court.

The police additional stated that the Supreme Court had constituted a fee of inquiry on its behalf within the Hyderabad encounter case, however this case of Dubey's encounter was completely different from that. All the principles have been adopted right here. The investigation is happening impartially.

The DGP stated that the investigation of the encounter is underway, whose particulars can’t be informed a lot in order that the confidentiality of the investigation stays. At the identical time, the Supreme Court has sought time that the reply that has been filed has been ready in a rush, he’ll later reply to each par of the petitions filed on this case.

Leave a Comment