Why the Beatles Didn’t Want to Release ‘Revolution 1’ as a Single

by Jeremy Spirogis
Why the Beatles Didn’t Want to Release ‘Revolution 1’ as a Single

If you have been in search of a political assertion from The Beatles, you didn’t hear something within the band’s early years all over 1967. After coming back from their ’68 journey to India, John Lennon deliberate to vary that.

The first time the Fab Four obtained collectively within the studio, the band ran via John’s new track, which he’d referred to as “Revolution.” After Beatles followers had digested “Hello, Goodbye” and “Lady Madonna,” the track John proposed as the subsequent single was going to be completely different.

“I wanted to put out what I felt about revolution,” he informed Rolling Stone in 1971. “I thought it was time we f–king spoke about it, the same as I thought it was about time we stopped not answering about the Vietnam war.”

With Beatles supervisor Brian Epstein gone, John thought it was time for the Fab Four to develop up and make an announcement. However, Paul McCartney and George Harrison had different concepts about diving into political issues.

Paul and George argued ‘Revolution 1’ was too sluggish for a single

Paul McCartney and John Lennon of The Beatles go to ‘The Tonight Show’ with visitor host Joe Garagiola on May 15, 1968. | NBCU Photo Bank

When John obtained began, he didn’t have to quantity the track titled “Revolution.” Only one existed, and it didn’t change till his bandmates made clear they didn’t need to make the observe the subsequent Fab Four A-side.

Yet as a substitute of confronting John in regards to the message of the track (or lack thereof), Paul and George argued the track wasn’t business sufficient. (They pointed to its sluggish tempo.) “George and Paul were resentful and said it wasn’t fast enough,” John mentioned in 1980.

[embedded content]

But John cared little in regards to the hit-making potential of his track. “If you go into the details of what a hit record is and isn’t, maybe,” he mentioned. “But the Beatles could have afforded to put out a slow, understandable version of ‘Revolution’ as a single, whether it was a gold record or a wooden record.”

Determined to get his message throughout, John cranked up the amps for the distorted, heavy model ultimately referred to as “Revolution.” However, the band stored that model on the B-side of their subsequent single, “Hey Jude.” The sluggish one turned “Revolution 1.”

John’s quick model of ‘Revolution’ brought about controversy, anyway

Beatles John Lennon (left) and Paul McCartney face the press in May 1968. | Bettmann

Though The Beatles hoped to cover “Revolution” considerably on the B-side, that didn’t work in the summertime of ’68. John’s declaration to “count me out” struck many as a weak assertion from such a robust determine. And the Fab Four felt one thing of a backlash.

Ironically, the unique model (“Revolution 1”) sounded stronger, with John saying “count me out, in.” (He couldn’t say by hook or by crook. He wished “to see the plan” first.) “I don’t fancy a violent revolution happening all over,” he defined to Rolling Stone in ’71.

Of course, with “Hey Jude” dominating the charts from August ’68 on, The Beatles didn’t come near being “canceled.” When The White Album adopted in November, extra success adopted. John nonetheless discovered methods to agitate of us; he simply didn’t get to do it on that individual A-side.

Also see: The Beatles Song With the Best Paul McCartney Guitar Solo

Leave a Comment