On the plea difficult the FIR lodged in 2018 on the advice of the Justice Ranjit Singh Commission within the Kotkapura coarseness challenge, the High Court has issued discover to the respondents together with the Punjab authorities and sought reply.
Petitioner Rashpal Singh mentioned that he was severely injured by a scuffle by the individuals who had been protesting over the indecency challenge in Kotkapura. As a result, he was retired on account of being bodily incapacitated.
Rashpal Singh mentioned that round 50 police personnel had been injured whereas controlling the protesters, together with the petitioner. An FIR was registered on this challenge on 14 October 2015 and one other FIR was registered within the indecency challenge. <! –
The petitioner mentioned that Justice Jora Singh after which Justice Ranjit Singh Commission had been assigned an inquiry into the difficulty first.
The petitioner mentioned that Justice Ranjit Singh was appointed by the present authorities. On the advice of Justice Ranjit Singh Commission, an FIR was once more registered within the topic of the incident in 2018 and an SIT was fashioned to research. Yachty mentioned that the SIT is made solely to entice cops.
In October 2015, the SIT shouldn’t be taking any motion in opposition to the FIR lodged in that challenge whereas controlling 50 protesters who had been badly injured. The petitioner mentioned that two FIRs don’t justify a difficulty.
IG Kunwar Pratap accused of political safety
The petitioner accused IG Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh, who was concerned within the SIT, for investigation underneath political safety. The petitioner has demanded the High Court to quash the FIR lodged in 2018. On this demand, SI Gurdeep Singh, accused by the fee, has additionally filed a petition. The High Court has summoned the reply on each the petitions by issuing discover to the opposite events together with the Punjab authorities for April 1.